Case Case Study Prima Facie Case - 1175 Words

1. Prima Facie Case: when the evidence of a case, given by a plaintiff, is enough to prove that an employer has violated EEO laws. Plaintiff: The person in a case who is suing. Accept on Remand: to send a case back to its original court after is has appeared in appeals court. Taken from http://thelawdictionary.org/remand/ on September 20, 2014 Consent Decree: A type of affirmative action from a legal proceeding enforced by an approved settlement between the plaintiff and defendant. Just Cause: A legal provision in which the employer must prove that the termination of an employee was based on an appropriate reason, and if it can’t be proved, it will be considered â€Å"wrongful† and the employer will be entitled to either rehire or mend the wrongful termination. Vicarious Liability: A company’s responsibility for the damages caused by harassment, if the employee is in an authoritative position. Mediation: An â€Å"alternative dispute resolution† that has a mediator negotiate the disputes of the plaintiff and defendant to help them reach an agreement; the mediator does not have the authority to enforce a settlement. Arbitration: another type of â€Å"alternative dispute resolution† in which a third party acts like a judge and listens to both sides, then decides on a legally binding settlement. Punitive Damages: a type of remedy made to punish an employer who has convicted serious violations. Undue Hardship: accommodations that would require a company to extensively alterShow MoreRelatedDeontology : A Sound Ethical Theory1312 Words   |  6 Pages Deontology: A Sound Ethical Theory The study of ethical theories has been proven to be somewhat of an acrmonious and challenging matter. Cultures and societies all over the world have different ideas on what should be considered morally right and what is morally wrong. With certain bias towards right and wrong based on culture and/or upbringing, studying and fully understanding each theory with an open mind can be quite difficult. Grasping each idea and making a choice as to which theory to adoptRead MoreAn Argument Against Non Naturalism887 Words   |  4 Pageslogical to due so. An argument against Kant’s categorical imperative: Consider the case of Katie who plays soccer because she kinda likes it but mostly because her mom and dad want her to. P1 If an act must be done because one strictly intrinsically wants to, than Katie’s acts of playing soccer does not have total intrinsic worth. P2 Katie’s acts of playing soccer do have intrinsic worth. P3 It is not the case that an act mist be done for the sake of intrinsic value for it to be good. C ThereforeRead MoreCompetition Act Case2367 Words   |  10 PagesCompetition act case MONDAY, 13 SEPTEMBER 2010 CCI v SAIL: Supreme Court Gets it Right! In a telling judgement, the Supreme Court of India, on Sep. 9, 2010, has effectively and judiciously circumscribed the boundaries of exercise of power by both the Competition Commission of India (CCI/Commission) and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (â€Å"the Tribunal†) while delivering its verdict in the much awaited case  Competition Commission of India v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.  This Note captures the highlightsRead MoreEssay on week2assignment1564 Words   |  7 Pages 1. Ethics is the study of (Points : 1) propositional knowledge. right and wrong. beauty. truth. none of the above. Question 2. 2. A sound-thinking deontologist might use which statement to support a woman’s right to vote? (Points : 1) The happiness of 50% of the population being allowed to vote outweighs the pain that might come out of the other 50%. Humans are autonomous beings that inherently have the same capacities. Read MoreTutorial 2 Professional Development1089 Words   |  5 Pagesone lectures (adapted from Beemsterboer, 2010; Velasquez et al, 2009) to the case study. a. identify the ethical dilemma In the above case study the ethical dilemma is whether to give the contract to company A which is a fair option among the two or give the contract to company B because it is run by Nirmal’s friend Devraj. And the dilemma is weather to choose fairness or friendship. b. list the facts of the case - The facts to be considered to decide who should be awarded the contract Read MoreKant s Categorical Imperative For The Practice Of Modern Medicine3842 Words   |  16 Pagesto the welfare, good, happiness, needs, interests, or values of the person being coerced†. and this violates individual’s autonomy and capacity to act rationally of one’s own accord. Kant provides us with these ethical guidelines however there are cases in medicine which illustrate that a physician’s expertise allows him to see that following a patient’s autonomous decision may lead to further suffering causing the health professional to take a paternalistic course of action. This ethical problemRead MoreWould Lowering the Speed Limits on Highwasy Actually Make Driving Safer?746 Words   |  3 Pagesmost state departments stand to loose a lot of money if speed limits are raised. LLLL says, â€Å"Politicians should never set speed limits, that’s how you get speed traps. It should be done scientifically by state police or the police in areas where a study is done†. Alex Tabarrok attributes some speed limits still remaining at 55 mph is due to the state wanting to create extra revenue by writing motorist tickets. A letter from a citizen to John Carr (National Motorists blog) states, â€Å"that even thoughRead MoreHow Whistleblowing I s A Major Issue For Private Organizations1755 Words   |  8 PagesHarvard Business Review. The theory supporting this article is utilitarianism, this can be seen through the importance of doing what is best for everyone involved, not just yourself. The third theory that can be argued is the idea of W.D. Ross and his prima facia duties. The concept of whistleblowing can be a touchy subject in the professional world, but it can be a vital towards promoting a healthy and stable work environment. The ideas of W.D. Ross best support the handling of whistleblowing in theRead MoreEssay on The Judicial Process and Batson Case2728 Words   |  11 PagesThe Judicial Process and Batson Case Despite the efforts of lawyers and judges to eliminate racial discrimination in the courts, does racial bias play a part in today’s jury selection? Positive steps have been taken in past court cases to ensure fair and unbiased juries. Unfortunately, a popular strategy among lawyers is to incorporate racial bias without directing attention to their actions. They are taught to look for the unseen and to notice the unnoticed. The Supreme Court in its precedentRead MoreAn Essay Of Two Abortion Arguments1701 Words   |  7 Pages Jill Sikora Marquis v.s. Thomson (An Essay of Two Abortion Arguments) Philosophers, lawyers, theologians and others have devoted and continue to devote their lives to study of the ethics of abortion. Since abortion was legalized, the abortion debate has intensified, and does not show any signs of being resolved anytime soon. The idea’s that advocate the women’s right to abort or the proactive logic that supports the pro-life view and the fundamental identity of the baby all come in hand